In case you need high-quality essay, we are here to help you. Would you like us to handle your paper? Use our writing services for better grades and meet your deadlines.
Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper
Long-Term Care Management
Assignment 1: A Legal and Ethical Dilemma
Due Week 3 and worth 250 points
Deciding to place a loved one into a long-term care facility can be extremely difficult. Even more difficult is the thought of your loved one’s rights being violated while in long-term care. Patient healthcare rights are not as clearly defined as one would expect, and there are long-term care and other healthcare facilities that create their own sets of patient rights. However, there are also certain indisputable rights afforded to patients across the board.
Read the case study titled “A Legal and Ethical Dilemma”, located on pages 463-465 of your text. Next, use the Internet or Strayer Library to research information on a patient’s right to die.
Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:
- Describe the legal and ethical dilemma discussed in the case study. Analyze the key ways in which a patient’s right to die relates to this specific case.
- From your research, specify the potential repercussions for failure to comply with the wishes of a patient who has requested to withhold a life-sustaining procedure. Next, take a position on whether the patient’s right to die or the patient’s right to be protected from harm should take precedence in this case. Provide a rationale for your position.
- Imagine that you are a part of the ethics committee investigating this case. Determine the main facts pertaining to the issue that the committee should consider. Suggest one (1) step that the facility should take next in order to resolve the dilemma. Provide a rationale for your response.
- Use at least three (3) quality academic resources. Note: Wikipedia and other similar websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
- Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
- Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
- Identify the factors that have led to the current realities of long-term care in the United States.
- Assess the various stakeholder groups of long-term care along with the nature of the relationship(s).
- Evaluate the impact of litigation on long-term care providers and practices.
- Use technology and information resources to research issues in long-term care management.
- Write clearly and concisely about long-term care management using proper writing mechanics.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills.
|
Assignment 1: A Legal and Ethical Dilemma |
||||
|
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 70% F |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
|
1. Describe the legal and ethical dilemma discussed in the case study. Analyze the key ways that a patient’s right to die relates to this specific case. Weight: 30% |
Did not submit or incompletely described the legal and ethical dilemma discussed in the case study. Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the key ways that a patient’s right to die relates to this specific case. |
Partially described the legal and ethical dilemma discussed in the case study. Partially analyzed the key ways that a patient’s right to die relates to this specific case. |
Satisfactorily described the legal and ethical dilemma discussed in the case study. Satisfactorily analyzed the key ways that a patient’s right to die relates to this specific case. |
Thoroughly described the legal and ethical dilemma discussed in the case study. Thoroughly analyzed the key ways that a patient’s right to die relates to this specific case. |
|
2. From your research, specify the potential repercussions for failure to comply with the wishes of a patient who has requested to withhold a life-sustaining procedure. Next, take a position on whether the patient’s right to die or the patient’s right to be protected from harm should take precedence in this case. Provide a rationale for your position. Weight: 25% |
Did not submit or incompletely specified the potential repercussions for failure to comply with the wishes of a patient who has requested to withhold a life-sustaining procedure. Did not submit or incompletely took a position on whether the patient’s right to die or the patient’s right to be protected from harm should take precedence in this case. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your position. |
Partially specified the potential repercussions for failure to comply with the wishes of a patient who has requested to withhold a life-sustaining procedure. Partially took a position on whether the patient’s right to die or the patient’s right to be protected from harm should take precedence in this case. Partially provided a rationale for your position. |
Satisfactorily specified the potential repercussions for failure to comply with the wishes of a patient who has requested to withhold a life-sustaining procedure. Satisfactorily took a position on whether the patient’s right to die or the patient’s right to be protected from harm should take precedence in this case. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your position. |
Thoroughly specified the potential repercussions for failure to comply with the wishes of a patient who has requested to withhold a life- sustaining procedure. Thoroughly took a position on whether the patient’s right to die or the patient’s right to be protected from harm should take precedence in this case. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your position. |
|
3. Determine the main facts pertaining to the issue that the committee should consider. Suggest one (1) step that the facility should take next in order to resolve the dilemma. Provide a rationale for your response. Weight: 25% |
Did not submit or incompletely determined the main facts pertaining to the issue that the committee should consider. Did not submit or incompletely suggested one (1) step that the facility should take next in order to resolve the dilemma. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response. |
Partially determined the main facts pertaining to the issue that the committee should consider. Partially suggested one (1) step that the facility should take next in order to resolve the dilemma. Partially provided a rationale for your response. |
Satisfactorily determined the main facts pertaining to the issue that the committee should consider. Satisfactorily suggested one (1) step that the facility should take next in order to resolve the dilemma. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response. |
Thoroughly determined the main facts pertaining to the issue that the committee should consider. Thoroughly suggested one (1) step that the facility should take next in order to resolve the dilemma. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response. |
|
4. 3 references Weight: 10% |
No references provided |
Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. |
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
|
5. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% |
More than 6 errors present |
5-6 errors present |
3-4 errors present |
0-2 errors present |
