In case you need high-quality essay, we are here to help you. Would you like us to handle your paper? Use our writing services for better grades and meet your deadlines.
Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper
After reading the article above reflect and write a paragraph (200 words or more) on a time in your classroom when you participated in Process Art. Make sure you address the following questions:
- A detailed description of your activity including materials you used, how you introduced the activity to your class, and what the children were expected to do
- A description of what the children did when they completed the activity. Include things you observed that they did, said, and how they reacted to the activity. Explain how you saw the children being creative.
- An explanation of what skills and learning you saw the children developing during the activity
Remember to reply to at least two of your classmate’s entries with at least 50 words or more .
Your completion of this assignment will be graded by this criteria rubric
Discussion Board Rubric
|
Criteria |
Unsatisfactory-Beginning |
Developing |
Accomplished |
Exemplary |
Total |
|
Ideas, Arguments, & Analysis |
|
||||
|
Ideas expressed lack an understanding of the discussion topic. Comments are irrelevant, off-topic, and/or confusing to follow. Viewpoint, if given, is not supported with evidence or examples. |
Ideas expressed in discussion posts show a minimal understanding of the discussion topic. Comments are general in nature and/or occasionally may not be relevant. Rehashes or summarizes ideas with limited analysis, original thought, and/or supported viewpoints. |
Ideas expressed in discussion posts are mostly substantive and relevant to topic; some original thought. Demonstrates logical thinking, reasoning, and/or analysis for most part. Viewpoint is supported with evidence and/or examples. |
Ideas expressed in discussion posts include original thought, substantial depth, and are relevant to topic. Viewpoint shows strong logical thinking, reasoning, and analysis with evidence and examples. Construction of new meaning and insights are evident. |
||
|
Connection to Course Materials |
5 Points |
6 Points |
7 Points |
8 Points |
|
|
No connections are made to readings or other course materials (lectures, media, resources, etc.), and/or if made, are not clearly stated and are largely personal opinions. |
Minimal direct connections are made to readings and/or other course materials (lectures, media, resources, etc.). Connections are largely inferred and somewhat unclear at times. |
Some direct connections are made to readings and/or other course materials (lectures, media, resources, etc.) and are clearly stated for the most part. |
Strong, direct connections are made to readings and/or other course materials (lectures, media, resources, etc.) and are clearly stated. |
||
|
Contribution to Learning Community |
6 Points |
7 Points |
9 Points |
9 Points |
|
|
Negligible contribution to the learning community. Rarely engages with students and generally ignores others’ posts and/or has a negative effect through misrepresenting content in other posts, inappropriate comments made, and/or attempts to dominate the discussion. |
Somewhat contributes to the learning community but the focus is generally on own posts. Occasionally interacts with others’ postings but little attempt to involve other students in the discussion. Short statements such as “I agree with…”. |
Contributes to the learning community. Often attempts to direct group discussion to present relevant viewpoints and meaningful reflection by others. Interacts respectfully with students. |
Effectively contributes to the learning community. Frequently initiates dialogue and motivates group discussion by providing feedback to students’ postings, asking follow-up questions, and through thoughtful, reflective comments. Respectfully encourages a variety of viewpoints and invites contributions from others |
